If you want a fast, clear, and creative workflow, Ableton wins. Bouncing audio, routing to the mixer, etc… Basic operations sometimes require an unnecessary amount of actions. Ableton Is FastĪ common complaint I’ve heard from people switching to Ableton Live is that FL Studio requires too many clicks. What you lack in flexibility is traded for clarity. In Ableton Live, everything is neatly organized. With so many windows open, you can get lost in the sauce pretty quickly when you start out. The downside however is that things can quickly get confusing. This is why FL Studio suits some people so well because they can adapt it specifically to what they need. You can pretty much make FL Studio adapt to any workflow. This is the beauty of having flexibility. You can assign each sound to a track in the timeline, or you can put patterns wherever the heck you want: It automatically assigns them in version 20, but you can still mix and match so that multiple sounds and instruments can be sent to the same mixer channel. The main difference that sets FL Studio and Ableton Live apart is that not all sounds are bound to an individual mixer channel. Need to see 5 different plugins and the playlist simultaneously? No problem. Want a mixer and step-sequencer on one monitor and arrangement on another? Easy. FL Studio: Feature Packed Versionįully-fledged software with full export capabilityĪ killer feature of FL Studio is the versatility of its layout. Depending on your goals and workflow, different feature sets can make a big difference. ![]() If you are looking at committing to a DAW, features are a crucial part. The features are every music producer’s favorite part : Ableton Live FL Studio 20įeatures are what make music production fun and enjoyable. Download the FREE EDM Starter Kit Ableton vs FL Studio: Features
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |